The Organizational Development Muse
Topics: process consulting, Process Consultation, Leading at a Higher Level, Art of Agreement, becoming a steward leader, the art of agreement, team communication, organizational learning, Process consultation and design, organizational development consulting, Organizational Transformation, leadership community, associational systems, triple loop learning, blurred communication, formal communication, informal communication, Mark L. Vincent, Design Group International, organizational communication, mark vincent, leadership and communication, organizational systems, organizational clarity, unproductive meetings, capital campaign communications, organizational development resources, Change Management, Team Leadership, personal leadership, Leading meetings, executive education, executive develpment, executive leadership training, Public Communication about Money,, Communicating about money, executive communication, leadership communication, business communication, business meetings, executive team meetings, Mobile Communication, leadership wisdom, relationship capital, executive learning, personal clarity, self-aware leader, organizational story, Managing Change, organizational development process, society for process consulting, corporate culture, feedback loops, board engagement, donor development, volunteer engagement, nonprofits, Community of Practice, Company Founder, Founder's Role
Topics: process consulting, strategic planning, executive leadership, Convene, Mark L. Vincent, Design Group International, CEO peer-based advising,, organizational development process, leading organizational change, long-sightedness, strategic mapping
Topics: process design, process consulting, Process Consultation, Leading at a Higher Level, discernmentarian, nonprofit leadership, servant leadership, Process consultation and design, It begins wtih design, organizational development consulting, Non-Profit Leadership, organizational process, strategic interim leadership, leadership failure, Organizational Transformation, leadership paradox, Organizational Life Cyle, sustainable vision, strategic planning, executive leadership, contextual leadership, stewardship based leadership, triple loop learning, organizational development muse, Convene, blurred communication, Mark L. Vincent, Design Group International, small business development, adaptive leadership, Organizational Management, leadership dynamic, action-reflection, mark vincent, organizational clarity, The Tao of Action-Reflection, steward leadership, leadership theory, leadership definition, leadership clarity, Developing Leaders, Change Management, leadership paradigm, Peer-based advising, leadership excellence, CEO peer-based advising,, executive communication, leadership communication, peer-based executive teams, Executive peer-based advising, long term decision making, leadership wisdom, Leadership intuition, forward-thinking realized, capacity building, selfless leadership, open vs. closed organizational systems, business success, organizational strategy, business design, business models, polarity management, one-page planning, organizational development process, society for process consulting, leadership transition, identifying adaptive change, leading organizational change, process chaplaincy, who what when where why how
For some time now we’ve been making a distinction between Process and Product when it comes to consulting:
- Product diagnoses and tells. Process listens and helps.
By Ron Mahurin, Senior Consultant
This post originally appeared here.
(Yet Strategy – and Process – Still Matter)
There is some debate as to whether the late Peter Drucker actually ever said: “culture will eat strategy for breakfast, every time.” The phrase does not appear in any of the 35+ books he wrote. In any case, the phrase has become an oft-cited expression in the organizational change literature.
Topics: process consulting
Recent work with a client led to developing these thoughts on the act of scapegoating.
Design Group International is committed to learning and helping rather than selling and telling. Our starting point is asking questions of the client rather than urging a product or service upon them.
Topics: process consulting
The following is a presentation made this past week at the Christian Leadership Alliance's Conference in Dallas, TX. It was part of a summit on Steward Leadership. Portions of what you will find below include input from summit participants.
Topics: process consulting, fiscal responsibility, board development, denominations, Stewardship Development, stewardism, associational systems, Mark L. Vincent, Design Group International, Fiscal Health, steward leadership, Executive Development, Five Stewardship Confusions
Over the years, we've turned, repeatedly, to the subject of Steward Leadership, especially as articulated in Scott Rodin's book on the Steward Leader. I've been privileged to support this work through some writing contributions to other titles:
We recently hosted a conversation on millennials in the manufacturing workplace and posted the notes from those proceedings here. It sparked some significant response and a wide amplification across a variety of market sectors. It also prompted the following response from Sterling Balstead, GM of the Minnesota facility for Engineered Pump Systems (full disclosure: I serve on the board of the company):
I hired three young engineers in the last two years and work with them daily. Previously, I worked with two other engineers who were 26 and 33 years old. I am [personally] right on the edge of this conversation at 36.
When I think about our younger employees I see we need to engage and work with them differently than older generations, or hold on and hope they change into their grandparents. Our company is used to employees who like or at least tolerate “8 hours per day + lots of overtime and few questions”---“nose to the grind stone”. It also seems important for these same people to “start on time every day”. Overtime seems to be proof of character[upon which] one can build identity. Another obstacle we face is the length of time it takes to train our engineering team. It takes 2+ years of employment to build the competency some of our current white collar job descriptions require, which I imagine is typical of small service based companies. This is a big deal given millennials seem willing to change jobs, locations, and maybe career paths more easily than previous generations. The younger generation seems to desire looser work schedules, working from home, and protecting personal time. I understand and admire some of these concepts.
Your conversation notes seem to highlights millennials liking well communicated goals and performance reviews. It also states they are jaded. I wonder if this is what non-millennials perceive when millennials are trying to make sense of “why” we are so rigid. To reframe the entire conversation positively, millennials may be asking: “who cares what road we take as long as we get to the final destination on time”.This GM, Sterling Balstead, is paying attention, thinking about the changes needed rather than resisting the tide, and moving forward--not just in technical innovation, but with personnel recruitment and workplace consideration.
Topics: process consulting, Process Consultation, organizational development consulting, Organizational Leadership, Mark L. Vincent, Design Group International, leadership development methods, millennials in the workforce, Millennials and manufacturing