The Organizational Development Muse - Mark L. Vincent

Subscribe by Email

Your email:

describe the image

Mark L. Vincent is Design Group International's CEO.

Find the Whorled Viewz collection on Pinterest

Follow Me on Pinterest
Wisconsin Yellow Pages

Religion Blog Directory
Business blog

The Organizational Development Muse

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Keeping the denominational connection. Yes, it includes funding.

  
  
  
  

denominational funding questionA much-loved conference minister within Mennonite Church USA* has been widely quoted as raising four questions to which everyone should answer yes if a particular church tradition wants to hold its center together around a common connection.  They are:

1. Is Christ Lord?
2. Is Scripture authoritative?
3. Is the Confession of Faith ours?
4. Are we being led by the Holy Spirit?

These are good questions. They make those who ask and answer face one another and be honest about their thoughts, rather than turn away from one another in disunity and with an accusing spirit.

To these good and powerful questions I'd like to suggest the most honest question of all remains unasked and unanswered:

5. Will I help to fund our common mission?

No church is built, no institution pays its bill, no denomination holds together if the people it serves are not generous and ready to share in the mission they hold together. Not surprisingly, the loudest voices of criticism--arguing that the church has departed from the faithful way--whether to the left or to the right--and even from the center--are not making financial contributions. Nor do they intend to.

Common belief that Christ is Lord should have us pouring out our offerings at his feet.

Common assent that Scripture is authoritative confronts us with the example of profound generosity demonstrated by the early church in Acts 2 and 4.

Common confession of Christian faith has us stating our belief in the firstfruits principle where the first and best of our lives are set aside for worship of the God who saves us, and the rest is used in generous, hospitable ways that bring glory to God.

Common leading by the Holy Spirit guides us to care for orphans and widows in their distress, something we cannot do if we withold financial support.

The point here is not so much that we should have a fifth question, but that if we answer yes to these questions, they should lead to unquestioned and lavish generosity. If that generosity is not there, we should wonder if we are being honest when we answer questions 1-4.

And yet, maybe we should ask question 5. If we do not ask it then those who do not give, but shout their dissent, will dominate the conversation while their denomination goes slowly bankrupt and those who were giving relocate their giving elsewhere.

-mark l vincent

*Chuck Neufeld, Conference Minister, Illinois Mennonite Conference.

Moby Dick, Whorled Viewz

__________

All blogs reflect the thoughts of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Design Group International, Inc.

Comments

Is "unquestioned and lavish generosity" towards congregation, conference and denomination REALLY the litmus test for whether one follows Jesus as Lord, embraces the Scriptures as authoritative, adheres to the Confession of Faith in a Mennonite Perspective, and is led by the Holy Spirit? 
 
To me such a litmus test, especially given the context of the overall post which assumes financial resources are available(i.e. assuming people have discretionary income at all after the bills are paid, the kids are clothed and fed, and the roof isn't leaking), misses the mark.  
 
I agree that conferences and denominations need to be funded. I just wonder if there is a better approach than saying "if you don't respond with unquestioned and lavish generosity you may want to reconsider if you really love Jesus."  
 
I believe that God's Kingdom is at hand! That people can reach out and touch it and live in it and thrive and live out the abundant life that Jesus came to give - starting right now (that doesn't always mean materially)! I believe that the various kingdoms of the world work against that in concrete/tangible ways. The space where these two kingdoms collide is the field of this world. Followers of Jesus in local communities live and breath in that space. It involves a very real, very great, battle.  
 
I also believe that Mennonites have a vital witness, in word and deed, that needs to be shared. Personally, I've found life in the Mennonite way of following Jesus that simply wasn't present in other Christian faith traditions/movements I've been involved in. The Mennonite Church is important. For the sake of the kingdom and the world, Mennonites need to be vital, engaged followers of Jesus. 
 
So tell me how the local conference helps the local congregation and it's congregants live as kingdom people in the world? If you can show people and local congregation how being connected to an area conferences strengthens their ability to be and do what it is God has called them to be and do funding will take care of itself. If you can show those same people, congregations and conferences how Mennonite Church USA strengthens their ability to be and do what God has called them to be and do, the funding will take care of itself. If you can't do that, then I think the worst thing we could do is respond with unquestioned and lavish generosity. 
 
 
Posted @ Thursday, July 28, 2011 4:43 PM by michaeldanner
Mr. Danner- 
Thank you for your comments to this post. Actually, the intent was NOT to say "unless you are generous you don't believe in Jesus." Rather, to say "our confession that we love Jesus and to be led by God's Spirit" leads to generosity, which, if I understand your comments correctly, is your major point. 
 
Generosity follows a sense of being called into mission. 
 
Unfortunately, I can tell many stories where funding does not follow the affirmation of common mission. That is because we do not seem to have a common affirmation of a firstfruits principle. 
 
Case in point: those who do not have are more generous that those who do. This has been demonstrated through countless studies. The issue is those whose bills include consumptive items such as extra vehicles, second homes, high cable tv/satellite systems and connectivity, therapeutic rather than necessary medical treatment, video gaming systems, netflix, etc. 
 
I have no problem with any of these elements of life per se, but the bills that are paid first after which so little is left over often include these items. 
 
Again, thank you for your comments. May God lead you (and me) deeper into a life of worshipful giving. 
 
-mark 
 
p.s. I've written a number of blog posts about my take on the future of denominations. If you scroll down in the blog you will find some of them. You may be surprised that I'm not blindly gung ho on denominational life, but believe that denominations need to keep demonstrating that they are centered on resourcing the local congregation, especially the calling and health of leadership at all levels. Of course, they can't make the shift if people aren't engaged in a the rhythm of firstfruits giving. . . .(Again, Acts 2 and 4).
Posted @ Thursday, July 28, 2011 8:38 PM by Mark L. Vincent
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics